It aims to guide the CPG's opinions for the activity reports from January / 2010. The metrics system is reassessed in March / April each year.

Chapter I - Evaluation Metrics

Article 1. The evaluations of activity reports made by CPG (three-year reports or according to the period stipulated by the higher levels) consider a system of metrics to prepare its opinion.

Single paragraph. Every CPG opinion must end with:

I - Comment on the form report: CPG considers the report {very good | good | regular | weak} for the profile according to Resolution CONSU-A-8, of 25/03/2008.

II - Recommendation on the approval of the form report: CPG recommends that the report be {approved | approved with reservations | disapproved}.

Article 2. CPG's opinion must consider the profiles approved by the IC congregation and by CONSU-A-8, of 25/03/2008 and will be divided into two parts: quantitative and qualitative.

Article 3. The quantitative assessment is based on the following points system:



International Journal


International Book




National Book


Doctoral defense


Defense of Doctorate with International Journal published


PhD Defense with International Congress published


International Congress


National newspaper


International Book Chapter




National Book Chapter


Master's Defense


Master's defense with publication


Paragraph 1 - If a master's or doctoral defense is co-supervised by an IC professor, he will receive half of the points received by the supervisor for the respective defense.

Paragraph 2 - In the quantitative evaluation, it is considered as boom the performance of teachers who have at least one publication in an international journal, a defense and have, in their report, the following average annual points:

CategoryAnnual average (Full)Annual average (Participant)

Paragraph 3 - For a professor with more than 5 years of Unicamp to have his report considered very good, in addition to outstanding performance, must have at least one doctoral defense completed in the last 5 years.

Article 4. Qualitative assessment is made up of several important items for each of the stages of your career. Your career level indicates the expected participation. Each item can only be counted once a year. The items are:

    · Regularly teach subjects in graduate school

    · Guide undergraduate students

    · Guide master students

    · Guide doctoral students

    · Participate in boards outside the IC

    · Publication at congresses

    · Book publishing

    · Publication in journals

    · Patent Licensing

    · Participation in the board of directors of the General Doctoral Qualification Exam

    · Participation in administrative activities

    · Participation in research projects with funding

    · Supervision of postdoctoral students

    · Participation as a supervisor within the teacher productivity recovery program.

    · Participate in program committees

    · Participation in committees of research funding agencies

    · Participation in the editorial board of a qualified magazine

    · Awards outside the IC (including Zeferino)

    · CNPq research grant

    · Organization of scientific events

    · Have your academic merit recognized by the international academic community, assessed at the discretion of CPG

Sole Paragraph - In the qualitative evaluation, it is considered boom the performance of teachers who have, in their report, the following items:

CategoryAnnual average (Full)Annual average (Participant)

Article 5. To have final performance Good, the teacher must perform Good both in qualitative and quantitative criteria.

Article 6. CPG will recommend that the report be Okay only if it has final performance Good ou Very good.

Article 7. All publications considered in the quantitative and qualitative evaluations must be in indexed or qualified vehicles. If necessary, the CPG may use a committee of experts to decide on the possible qualification of a publication. Only publications actually published will be considered.

Article 8. Extreme cases, considering the distribution of scientific production, equivalence of scientific productions, qualification of articles or other productions of merit may be considered when justified, at the discretion of CPG.

Chapter II - Special Cases

Article 9. CPG will be able to make a differentiated assessment for reports of teachers' activities in special cases.

Paragraph 1 - Teachers who have had extended leave of absence without academic activities (eg illnesses) or who are already in a position to retire may have reduced quantitative and qualitative requirements.

Paragraph 2 - Teachers who fall under the following conditions, may have reduced qualitative requirements:

 I - Post-doctoral professors or those who have recently returned from a post-doctorate.
II - Volunteer Collaborating Professors.

Chapter III - Productivity Recovery Plan

Article 10. CPG must strive to allow the recovery of the production of teachers who are below the indicated levels, offering extra options to restart the production process. Interested faculty members should contact CPG to obtain a subset of the following benefits:

I - Postponement of a point in the teaching load (negotiated with the CG). This point must be met within the next two years.
II - A master's scholarship for a student of your choice, among the candidates enrolled in the program, whose admission will be approved by CPG. The student will be subject to other scholarship maintenance rules.
III - A master's scholarship for co-orientation with another full professor of IC.
IV - Assistance to the teacher to present an article at an event.
V - Teacher support for a post-doctorate.

This resolution will take effect for the evaluation reports received for evaluation by CPG from January 2010.
Internal Resolution CPG / IC - 003/2008 of 16/09/2008, approved by the Congregation of the IC on 01/10/2008.