Gavin Andresen - 2011-06-20 00:23:29

Since you aren't a cryptographer, why not just implement transactions with multiple signatures?
Because sending to a multiple-signature-required address requires a new standard transaction type, a new type of bitcoin address, and a protocol for Device 1 <-> Device 2 communication. More code means more possibility of bugs, so I was hoping there is a simpler solution.

And as I said in the original post, I wanted to start discussion:
Quote
and then point me to a FIPS standard that has it all figured out already...
If the answer is "multiple signatures" then so be it.