423
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 12:22:28 PM
|
Imagine if bitcoin actually "dominated fiat currency" and became a global finance leader for banks etc. like the bulls dream of, and then shit like this happens.
If bitcoin was a global finance leader as you say , do you think people like the clowns at mtgox would still be in charge of 20% of the trade? If bitcoin was a global finance leader, would its traders still pretend that 3/4 of the global market simply does not exist?
|
|
|
428
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 09:51:20 AM
|
Why are people selling on MtGox - do they believe that they'll be able to withdraw USD when they cannot withdraw BTC?
My guess: if one expects that he will have to sue MtGOX to get their account balance out, it may be better to have it in dollars than in bitcoins. "He owes me 70,000 dollars" may sound more substantial to prosecutors and judges than "he owes me 100 bitcoins". EDIT: missing words "he will have to"
|
|
|
429
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 09:14:24 AM
|
Thanks! (But it gives only the minute-by minute summary, which merges several transactions into each entry. A transaction by transaction log would be easier to read...) I hope someone is saving the transaction logs of all exchanges. It should be a gold mine for bitcoin historians and statistical market research or all kinds...
|
|
|
433
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 08:29:27 AM
|
Preparing for an epic dip. No word from Mt Gox and they promised update today JST.
I suspect that the news from MtGOX will be bad for those trapped there, but in any case there should be no immediate impact on price at other exchanges. Most traders must have been aware of their problems for weeks, and are not affected by them. Even a complete collapse of MtGOX should affect the price only in the longer term, after it is featured on mainstream media and scares some potential investors away from Bitcoin.
|
|
|
435
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 08:00:57 AM
|
Huobi's volume is much lower than yesterday's; nearly as low as it was during some days of the New Year holiday week, when banks were closed. Yet I found no mention in the web of Feb 10 being a bank holiday in China.
I am now afraid that my prediction (4450 CNY at 19:00 UTC) will fail, as it depended on the general downward trend we have seen since the end of the Chinese bank holidays (a trend which is manifest only when the Chinese are fast asleep).
Right now it would take at least 1500 BTC of trade to get Huobi down to 4450. But I still have some hope: we are still 12 hours away from the target time, and even at the current slow pace the total volume until then will be much more than that.
I do not know what could be driving that downward trend, but the cause is probably in China since it started sharply at the end of the holidays, after the price had been nearly constant for a week. Perhaps there is a steady stream of disappointed Chinese investors leaving the game, so that the Chinese market has fewer and fewer Yuan competing for the same number of Bitcoins?
|
|
|
437
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 02:15:13 AM
|
If the price at Coinbase is higher than that of other exchanges, people should flock there to sell, but no one would want to buy from them at those prices. So Coinbase must be collecting lots of bitcoins and depleting their dollar reserves. And they cannot sell those bitcoins now without a substantial loss. This is what MtGOX was doing until a couple of days ago. (Perhaps Coinbese is trying to fill the market niche that MtGOX abandoned? ) Perhaps they believe that the prices will rebound to more than 730 soon? Is there a general shortage of money in the other exchanges, that might be cured when the banks open today? What is preventing arbitrage from working (buy cheap coins at other exchanges, sell them to Coinbase for 30%+ profit)? We knew why in the case of MtGOX, but that explanation does not apply to Coinbase, does it?
|
|
|
438
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 01:23:22 AM
|
Ok, I was a U.S. Navy "Nuke" on the U.S.S. Ohio. Three mile Island was not a meltdown, partial or otherwise. The control rods scrammed and it was sub-critical. Some fission particles escaped when the core was partially uncovered. This is not a meltdown.
Sorry to have started an off-topic discussion... But Three Mile Island was indeed a meltdown, although it fortunately failed to breach the pressure vessel. The industry initially denied any meltdown, but the truth became evident many years later, when the pressure vessel was finally opened and its contents were removed. A large portion of the fuel had melted, leaving a wide cavity in the middle of the core. The molten stuff trickled down through the remaining water, bore twice through internal steel baffles and collected at the bottom of the pressure vessel. If the operators had taken a little longer to do the right thing, it would surely had breached the pressure vessel, like Fukushima #1--#3 did. See the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident. (The /Science/ magazine had a long article about that in the 1980s). EDIT: PS. By the way, the Fukushima reactors all scrammed properly and were completely shut down when the tsunami hit. The meltdown occurred because of the heat given off by the radioactive elements resulting from fission, which is not stopped by the control rods and requires active cooling for months after shutdown. Also, none of the reactors that melted down used sodium as a coolant.
|
|
|
439
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 10, 2014, 12:34:19 AM
|
Daily volumes of BTC trade to/from USD and other national currencies (in kBTC): ! Thu ! Fri ! Sat ! Sun ! Mon ! Tue ! Wed ! Thu ! Fri ! Sat ! Sun ! EXCHANGE ! 01/30 ! 01/31 ! 02/01 ! 02/02 ! 02/03 ! 02/04 ! 02/05 ! 02/06 ! 02/07 ! 02/08 ! 02/09 ! Currencies considered
MtGOX | 6.60 | 4.45 | 5.13 | 2.28 | 3.37 | 5.40 | 8.20 | 21.54 | 58.89 | 26.82 | 23.48 | USD,EUR,GBP,AUD,JPY Bitstamp | 13.13 | 7.73 | 8.30 | 4.07 | 4.93 | 7.59 | 8.48 | 20.65 | 42.79 | 13.50 | 15.06 | USD BTC-e | 12.54 | 4.65 | 6.30 | 4.74 | 5.75 | 4.51 | 6.55 | 9.72 | 31.84 | 11.67 | 12.51 | USD,EUR,RUR BitFinEx | 8.18 | 3.91 | 4.54 | 3.15 | 3.45 | 3.36 | 5.22 | 21.11 | 66.36 | 11.12 | 12.07 | USD Bitcoin.DE | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 1.30 | 0.37 | 0.47 | EUR Kraken | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.59 | 1.45 | 0.37 | 0.45 | EUR CampBX | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.27 | 0.24 | USD CaVirtEx | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 1.07 | 0.57 | 0.23 | CAD Crypto-Trade | 0.01 | . | 0.01 | 0.01 | . | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | USD
SUBTOTAL | 41.61 | 21.58 | 25.31 | 15.11 | 18.40 | 21.72 | 29.34 | 74.86 | 204.57 | 64.70 | 64.54 |
Huobi | 29.27 | 15.26 | 28.86 | 26.27 | 24.77 | 18.65 | 19.55 | 39.97 | 131.91 | 77.00 | 64.08 | CNY OKCoin | 18.56 | 17.11 | 20.38 | 20.00 | 18.09 | 12.77 | 12.33 | 26.07 | 74.37 | 37.63 | 34.63 | CNY BTC-China | 1.99 | 1.17 | 2.31 | 2.21 | 1.70 | 1.33 | 1.54 | 4.09 | 17.66 | 6.86 | 5.75 | CNY (NOTE 1)
SUBTOTAL | 49.82 | 33.54 | 51.55 | 48.48 | 44.56 | 32.75 | 33.42 | 70.13 | 223.94 | 121.49 | 104.46 |
TOTAL | 91.43 | 55.12 | 76.86 | 63.59 | 62.96 | 54.47 | 62.76 | 144.99 | 428.51 | 186.19 | 169.00 |
All numbers were collected by hand from the site http://bitcoinwisdom.com. Beware of possible errors. For each exchange, the numbers include only the trade volume to/from the currencies listed in the rightmost column. Trade between BTC and other cryptocoins, such as LiteCoin, is NOT included. Coinbase is said to use Bitstamp for currency conversion. Dates on the header line are UTC. Specifically, "01/15" means "from 01/15 00:00:00 UTC to 01/15 23:59:59 UTC". (Beware that Bitcoinwisdom uses your local time, so the date may appear to be off by 1 day. For example, if you are 2 hours west of Greenwich, it may show "01/14 22:00" when the UTC time is "01/15 00:00".) (NOTE 1) On 2014-01-30, BTC-China had a burst of extremely fast, regular and atypical transactions, all with similar amounts (a few tens of BTC) and prices (~4836 CNY), adding up to about 41,050 BTC. The burst started suddenly around 17:00 UTC and and stopped suddenly around 19:30 UTC. Presumably those transactions were made by a faulty robot trading against itself or some other robot, and did not represent actual exchange of money and bitcoins between distinct individuals. Therefore those anomalous transactions were subtracted from the BTC-China volume for Jan/30.
|
|
|
440
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 09, 2014, 11:56:20 PM
|
US-centric much?
Marijuana has been criminalized in most countries only because of pressure by the US. Ditto for music/video/software sharing, unscrambling HDMI signals, and several others. So if the US bans cryptocoins, most Western nations will probably follow suit. It is true that the ban on marijuana did not stop its use, and actually increased its price by several orders or magnitude. However, marijuana can be grown and sold in secret, while cryptocoins cannot be used without accessing the very public blockchain and support network. I cannot imagine how the network could continue to function if the US decided to stop it. there seems to be a correlation between people not being willing to describe themselves as anarchists/libertarians and their faith in the viability and effectiveness of the political process to effect meaningful positive change.
Why is that surprising? Rejection of the traditional political process is almost a definition of anarchism/libertarianism, isn't it?
|
|
|
|