# Last edited on 2026-01-19 22:44:22 by stolfi

  h.parags(st, """The transcription I used was a new one that I created manually from the BL 2014 images. It is complete only for the 'str' section.  I compared it line by line with Rene's latest trasnscriprion and double-checked the discrepancies against the images.  The main differences are:""")
  
  h.begin_enum(st, "ul")
  
  h.enum_item_parags(st, """(1) I carefully revised the parag breaks in the StarPS section, as will be detailed in a separate report.  My transcription has 327 parags, four of which have no star "bullet" but are evident for other features.  The boundaries of these and other parag breaks differ from Rene's.""")
  
  h.enum_item_parags(st, """(2) I transcribed as plain EVA many glyphs that Rene encoded as weirdos.   I assumed that those were errors by the Scribe or the Retracers, and encoded the correct glyph whenever I felt that it could be guessed with some confidence.  In particular, I encoded as @'Ch', @'CTh', etc. all the glyphs that looked like @'Ih', @'ITh', etc.. I also encoded as @'Sh' all cases of @'Ch' with plume, even those that had the plume over the first or second @e instead of on the ligature.""")
  
  h.enum_item_parags(st, """(3) I made more liberal use of the EVA dubious space ','.""")
  
  h.end_enum(st, "ul")
  
  h.parags(st, """ I hope to release at some future date, once I got at elast the other three major sections ('hea', 'heb' and 'bio').""")
 
  # str: prob q = 0.1716, bad = 0.0062. normal = 0.8222
  # hea: prob q = 0.0912, bad = 0.0126. normal = 0.8962