# Description:
#
#   This page is blank except for four lines of text at the top
#   (numbered "0" to "3") and some drawings at the top left corner. 
#   
#   The text is rougly justified against the left margin, and ragged
#   on the right. Line 0 is flush against the top edge of the vellum,
#   lines 1-3 lie about 1/2 inch below it, with normal interline
#   spacing. Except for two Voynichese words at the beginning of line
#   3, the text is written in a peculiar script ("Michitonese") that
#   seems to be intermediate between ordinary (Latin) alphabet and the
#   VMs script. The handwriting is irregular and not very readable.
#   The letters in line 0 is somewhat smaller but apparently in the
#   same handwriting as the rest.
#
#   The area next to the upper left corner is hevily stained and
#   wrinkled. There is a large hole in the vellum, 2-3mm wide, near
#   the upper left corner, about 2cm from the edges. Lines 1 and 2
#   of the text start right next to the hole.
#
#   In the dark region between the hole and the left edge, roughly
#   aligned with text line #2, there is the drawing of a four-legged
#   animal, resembling a dog with round ears, short hais, and a fat
#   but pointed tail. The animal is facing left, with the snout right 
#   against the vellum's edge.
#
#   Below the animal is a female nymph (with breasts), naked except for some
#   simple hat.  She is facing seems to be seated on a sloping surface,
#   right at the edge of the dark area, with arms stretched sideways
#   and down.
#
#   Above the anumal there is a drawing of an unidentified bulbous object.
#
#   There is a large question mark at the right margin, aligned with 
#   line 3 but well beyound its end.  It shows up in Newbold's reproduction.
#
#   In one reproduction of this page there is a very faint line of modern-style
#   digits below part of the first line. Each letter (but not the "+"
#   signs) has a single digit below it; except that one can see also
#   the numerals "10" and "13", each squeezed under a single letter.
#   (Part of the line is unreadable, so "11" and "12" could be there
#   too.) However these digits were probably scribbled on the copy,
#   since they do not show up in Newbold's reproduction.
#
