# Comments:
# 
#   As proof that panels f101v2 (this page) and f101v1
#   comprise a single logical page, note that v1 has no containers,
#   but otherwise has the same layout as v2: three rows of plants (the
#   first two labeled), and three paragraphs at the bottom. Moreover
#   the paragraphs in v2 have 3.0, 3.0, and 3.0 lines, all aligned
#   with those of v1; and the last paragraph of v2 is followed by a
#   right-justfied title---which lines up neatly with the last line of
#   v1. [Stolfi]
#
#   The source of the reproduction in O'Neill's paper is acknowledged
#   as "Through the kindness of Mrs Voynich, the owner of the Ms, Dr.
#   Petersen of this institution, possesses a photostat copy of it".
#   [Gabriel 98/Mar/07]
#
#   The position of the containers suggests they were not
#   planned from the beginning, but added after the plant drawings
#   were complete. In fact this seems to be true of the whole pharma
#   section. [Stolfi]
#
#   "Fair copies" of some of these plant drawings are found elsewhere. [Stolfi]
#   
#   Some of the plants on row 2 could be algae. [Stolfi]
#
#   Plant [1,2] strongly resembles the "sunflower" on f93r. [Stolfi]
#
#   Plant [2,4] has roots with 'knots' as if it's a tree. The leaves
#   look like chestnut's. [Rene 98/Aug/16]
#
#   The leaves and overall shape of plant [3,1] resemble those of 
#   plant f100v[3,3]. [Stolfi]
#
#   The root and face on the root of plant [3,4] are standard medieval
#   symbolism. (Presumably it means that a "good" specimen is one
#   whose shape and spots resemble a human face, just as a "good"
#   mandrake root is one that resembles a human body.) [Stolfi 98/Aug/13]
#
#
