# Comments:
#
#   It is not clear whether the "start here" strokes at 10:00-10:30
#   are original, or modern guesses scribbled on the copy. If the
#   latter, then they seem wrong, because those word gaps are quite
#   ordinary and not aligned.
#
#   Another possible starting place is at 01:15, where both rings have
#   aligned, extra-wide word breaks.
#
#   On the other hand, the EVA "p" on the the 10:30 radial line suggests 
#   that that is indeed the first line.
#
#   The center figure is probably female.
#
#   Note that the small and large star counts are almost the same (67
#   and 63); perhaps 64 was the intended number. Note also that the
#   small star counts are unimodal. The big star counts would be
#   unimodal too if the 11:00 sector had 7 stars, or the 09:30 sector
#   had 8. The latter seems more likely as it would have bumped the
#   number of big stars to 64. In both sequences the minimum is around
#   01:10 (the aligned breaks!) and the maximum around 07:00.
#
#   The "tail" in the 03:00 sector may mean that one of the stars is a comet.
#
#
