# Gavin Andresen
# 2011-05-15 18:05:11
# https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8392.msg122487#msg122487

I think sipa is right@p{--} it will just look like a weird double-spend. @p{par}

Probably a good idea to reject transactions with non-canonical signatures (reject if encode(decode(tx)) != tx ). @p{par}

I assume the DER-encoded ASN.1 octet representation is the same between different ECDSA implementations (so if a non-openssl-based implementation creates transactions its transactions would be accepted), is that a good assumption? @p{brk}