Gavin Andresen - 2010-11-21 14:08:42

@s{quotedtext} @s{quotedtext} Wasn't me.  I don't remember Satoshi ever writing something like that, but I'm really good at forgetting things.

I agree with ribuck, if we ever need more than 21quadrillion bit-atoms, encoding more using the unused high bits in the 64-bit number will work nicely.

That would be a very nice problem to have.