# Gavin Andresen
# 2011-11-03 14:36:52
# https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49764.msg605381#msg605381

@s{quotedtext}
@s{quotedtext}
Good question. The timeline for clients is less critical, as long as a majority of hashing power will properly interpret OP_EVAL clients that relay/generate those transactions can be rolled out anytime after Feb 1. @p{par}

So I'd suggest releasing a 0.5.something or 0.6 after the Jan 15 "are the big miners on board" evaluation that turns on OP_EVAL support Feb 1. @p{par}


@s{quotedtext}
@s{quotedtext}
 @p{brk}
Same time. @p{par}


@s{quotedtext}
@s{quotedtext}
 @p{brk}
Another very good question. The timestamp in the block will be used to determine whether OP_NOP1s in the block are interpreted as no-ops or OP_EVAL when checking block validitity (wall-clock GMT time will be used to figure out if the node should relay/mine OP_EVAL transactions). I'll double-check my code, I think I did NOT code it that way. @p{par}


@s{quotedtext}
@s{quotedtext}
 @p{brk}
That seems exceedingly unlikely; once the big mining pools switch, there is a very strong incentive for the smaller pools to switch, too. @p{brk}