# Gavin Andresen
# 2012-07-30 17:22:03
# https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43616.msg1065504#msg1065504

@s{quotedtext}
@s{quotedtext}
That's not quite right. @p{par}

The protocol supports it@p{--} just take the output of an unconfirmed transaction (paying to you) and then broadcast a send-to-self transaction that uses it as input and has a big, juicy fee. @p{par}

I think the Eligius mining pool might even notice and confirm both transactions@p{--} Luke DashJr has a @p{(link}pull request@p{link)} to change the reference implementation's transaction selection code to consider fees for sets of related transactions when deciding what to include in a block. @p{brk}